Loading icon

Your Genes and Your MS Treatment: Could They Be Connected?

Post banner image
Share:

For people living with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), interferon beta (IFNb) therapy is often a first-line defense, helping to reduce relapses and slow down the accumulation of disability. These medications, which come in slightly different forms (IFNb-1a given intramuscularly or subcutaneously, and IFNb-1b given subcutaneously), work by modulating the immune system. However, a significant challenge can arise: some individuals develop neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (NAbs) that can actually block the effectiveness of the treatment.

Scientists have been working hard to understand why some people develop these antibodies and others don't. Now, a fascinating study by Link et al. sheds new light on this puzzle, suggesting that our genes, specifically those related to our immune system (called Human Leukocyte Antigen or HLA genes), might play a crucial role in determining the risk of developing these NAbs.

Peeking Inside the Study:
The researchers in Sweden looked at a large group of 903 individuals with MS who were receiving one of the three main types of IFNb. They analyzed their HLA genes and their NAb status – whether they had developed these blocking antibodies and, if so, at what level. The study aimed to see if certain HLA gene variations (alleles) were more common in people who developed NAbs, especially those with high levels of NAbs that are likely to impact treatment.

What Did They Find?
The results revealed some intriguing connections between specific HLA genes and the risk of developing NAbs, and even more interestingly, these connections seemed to depend on the specific IFNb preparation being used.

* The HLA-DRB1\*15 Connection: The study found that carrying the HLA-DRB1\*15 gene variation was associated with an increased risk of developing NAbs and high NAb levels overall. This gene has also been linked to a higher risk of developing MS in the first place. When the researchers looked at the different IFNb preparations separately, they found that HLA-DRB1\*15 carriage increased the risk of developing NAbs and high NAb levels against both subcutaneous and intramuscular IFNb-1a. In fact, for patients receiving subcutaneous IFNb-1a, this gene significantly increased the absolute risk of developing NAbs to 43.3% and high NAb levels to 27.7%.

* A Protective Gene for One Treatment? Interestingly, the study also found that in patients using subcutaneous IFNb-1a, carrying the HLA-DQA1\*05 gene variation seemed to decrease the risk of developing high levels of NAbs.

* IFNb-1b's Own Story: For individuals treated with IFNb-1b, a different HLA gene, HLA-DRB1\*04, was associated with an increased risk of developing high NAb levels. Further analysis pointed to a specific subtype, DRB1\*04:01, as being linked to a higher risk of NAb development against IFNb-1b. The absolute risk of developing high NAb levels for DRB1\*04 carriers on IFNb-1b was 28.2%.

Why Might This Be Happening?
The researchers suggest that these gene-specific risks could be related to how our immune system recognizes the different IFNb molecules. HLA molecules play a crucial role in presenting protein fragments (peptides) to our immune cells (T cells). If an IFNb peptide binds strongly to a particular HLA molecule, it might trigger a stronger immune response, leading to the production of NAbs.

The slight differences in the structure of IFNb-1a and IFNb-1b might explain why different HLA genes are associated with NAb development for each. For example, the study's analysis suggested that the DRB1\*04:01 allele, linked to higher NAb risk with IFNb-1b, might bind differently to IFNb-1b peptides compared to IFNb-1a peptides. The fact that IFNb-1b is not glycosylated (doesn't have sugar molecules attached) while IFNb-1a does could also play a role in how these drugs are processed and presented to the immune system.

What Does This Mean for You?
This research provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between our genes and our response to MS treatments. While more research is needed to confirm these findings in other groups of patients, these results suggest that HLA genotyping could potentially become a tool in the future to help personalize MS treatment decisions.

Imagine a scenario where, before starting IFNb therapy, your doctor could check your HLA type to assess your potential risk of developing NAbs for different IFNb preparations. This information, combined with other factors, could help guide the choice of the most suitable treatment option, potentially improving long-term efficacy. For example, the study's data hinted that for individuals carrying DRB1\*15, IFNb-1b might pose a lower risk of losing efficacy due to NAbs compared to subcutaneous IFNb-1a, and vice versa for DRB1\*15-negative individuals carrying DRB1\*04.

Important Considerations:
It's crucial to remember that this study highlights potential genetic influences, but the choice of IFNb preparation remains the single most significant factor influencing the risk of developing NAbs. Subcutaneously injected IFNb products tend to be more immunogenic than intramuscular IFNb-1a. Even for individuals with the "risk" HLA genes, intramuscular IFNb-1a still appeared to be the least likely to induce NAbs.

Furthermore, the researchers acknowledge that their study has limitations, such as not having a separate group of patients to confirm their findings. The methods used to determine HLA types also had some limitations, particularly for certain HLA variations. Therefore, these exciting findings need to be validated in larger, independent studies.

The Bigger Picture:
This research not only advances our understanding of why NAbs develop in MS patients but also has implications for other biological treatments used for various diseases where the development of blocking antibodies is a concern. By unraveling the genetic factors involved in these immune responses, we can pave the way for more personalized and effective therapies in the future.

In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence that our HLA genes can influence the risk of developing neutralizing antibodies against different interferon beta preparations used to treat multiple sclerosis. While more research is needed, these findings offer a glimpse into a future where genetic information could help tailor treatment choices for individuals living with MS, ultimately aiming for better and more sustained therapeutic benefits.

Disclaimer: This blog post is based on the provided research article and is intended for informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice. Please consult with a healthcare professional for any health concerns.

References:
Link J, Lundkvist Ryner M, Fink K, Hermanrud C, Lima I, et al. (2014) Human Leukocyte Antigen Genes and Interferon Beta Preparations Influence Risk of Developing Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis. PLoS ONE 9(3): e90479. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090479